Archive for December, 2010

Is ObamaCare constitutional???

December 22, 2010

Is ObamaCare constitutional? 

That seems to be one of the most important questions being asked these days.  I am not a legal scholar, but neither were our Founding Fathers.   From the arguments I have seen, I would have to say not only no, but Hell NO!!  This is just my opinion.  At least one federal court, at this time, also feels that ObamaCare is unconstitutional.  I do know that this will go before the Supreme Court, unless it is repealed before then.  I do not feel that I have given the authority to any government to dictate what I HAVE to buy with my own money.  Not only that, but I will NEVER give that authority!!  However, I do have a proposal for the new Congress.  If the Supreme Court rules that it is unconstitutional, what should happen next?

Lets introduce a Bill that states: 

Should the Judicial Branch rule, including appeals, that any Law is unconstitutional, then 1) any Congressperson or Senator that voted FOR the Bill, and the President that signs the Bill into Law; shall forfeit all future compensation from the United States government, including any retirement compensation, any health benefits, any death benefits, any protection benefits, etc. 2)  Any current Member of Congress or current Senator or current President; shall be immediately expelled from their position.  3)  After being expelled from their positions, their new title will include Disgraced.  For example; the Disgraced Senator or the Disgraced Congressperson or the Disgraced President.  4)  If that person then runs for another position in the Legislative Branch, the Executive Branch or the Judicial Branch and wins that position, the position will be uncompensated.

These people have Sworn an Oath (Senators, Congresspeople, President).

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.

Personally, I am no longer willing to solely wait for the judgement of God.  I feel that there needs to be a penalty for Breaking their Oath here and now! 

I do not think that anyone should be “testing” the limits of the Constitution.  Let me know what you think.

Advertisements

The “Cost” of Keeping Current Tax Rates…

December 17, 2010

Sometimes I find an article, from a respected source, that just makes me want to Scream!!!  Where do these “authors” come from?  How do they keep getting paid?

Normally, I enjoy reading Forbes, as I find that they provide differing view points on subjects, and try to explain complex situations.  The article by Brian Wingfield, “Congress Sends Tax Bill To Obama“, however, is NOT one of those articles.  Here is the quote that is obviously false (or a blatant attempt to mislead readers):

At a cost of of $858 billion over the next decade–none of it paid for–the bill is the single most damaging measure for the U.S. federal budget deficit that Congress has produced in years. (More so than either the 2008 TARP program, the 2009 economic stimulus bill or the health care reform act signed into law earlier this year.)”

Mr. Wingfield, are you kidding me??  Let me outline the mistakes in this quote:

     1.  No where in the article, do you reference where your numbers come from.  For this I will assume that the $858 Billion number is correct.

    2.  It would have been respectful of your readers if you had prefaced your opinion with something.  “I feel that this is the single most damaging measure passed by Congress…” would have been much better than presenting it as a fact.  To be honest, if you had done this, I probably would have let this opinion slide.  Also, it would have been more enlightening to your readers if you had finished the statement and said who/what the act was “damaging” to.  Was it damaging to the American Public? Tax payers? Government employees? Special Interests?  By leaving the subject open, the reader must assume what you mean.

     3.  To say that the continuation of the current tax code “costs” more than Obamacare, is provably incorrect.  Even the Democrats said, when they passed shoved it down our throats, that the “cost” would be $980 BILLION (UPDATE: $940 Billion) in the first decade.  But if you need more proof read the report from the CBO.  The Weekly Standard has a good summary.  The CBO estimates that Obamacare will cost more than $2 TRILLION, or more than double your “cost” of extending the current Tax rates.

     4.  Which brings me to your false argument that extending the current tax rates “costs” anything!!  IF you keep tax rates the same, it does not cost the Government ANYTHING!!  The definition of cost is the amount PAID for something.   As there is NO money leaving the governments hand, being received by the tax payers, it is NOT A COST to the government!!!  IF the government were to RAISE taxes, it would COST the American Tax payers money.  Lowering taxes does NOT cost the government money.  It merely reduces the government revenue.

Please, do at least some research before you attempt to sway your readers to your viewpoint.  Please, spend some time and learn the English language instead of parroting your favored mentors and spreading their poisonous falsehoods.

As for your “opinion” that extending the current tax rates is the most damaging act passed, Obamacare is far worse for the American public.  I also feel that the “cost” of the stimulus was much greater, as the $800+ Billion was expensed in a single year, as opposed to a full decade.  It would be nice if you would at least explore the other side of any argument.